This event, which concluded on 18th April 1521,
has gone down in history with an unfortunate name that means something
completely different from what most English-speaking people would assume. It
was in fact a fundamental turning point in the history of Christianity.
The Opponents
The word “diet” means simply a government assembly (from the
Latin “dies” meaning “day”, although diets could last a lot longer than a
single day). This particular one met in the city of Worms in south-western
Germany. Although diets in the Holy Roman Empire were supposedly legislative
gatherings, they were in reality echo chambers for the Emperor, whose word was
law.
The Holy Roman Emperor was the governor of an association of
states in Northern Europe, nominally sanctioned by the Pope in Rome. At the
time this was Charles V, who wielded absolute power over his territories
despite only being 21 years old.
The Diet of Worms had been convened as a form of trial for a
German monk who had dared to defy the authority of the Roman Catholic Church,
namely Martin Luther.
In October 1517 Luther had published his “Ninety-Five
Theses” which were points of dispute with the Church, especially over what
Luther regarded as its corrupt practices. These were challenged by the Pope and
other theologians, leading to Luther being accused of heresy. When he refused
to recant his views he was summoned to Worms to explain himself.
A Courageous Appearance
Martin Luther saw no reason to try to avoid the summons,
given that he was more than keen to defend and expound his opinions regarding
the sorry state of the Roman Catholic Church. He was warned by friends that –
if found guilty of heresy – his life could well be in jeopardy. His reply was:
“I am resolved to enter Worms although as many devils should set upon me as
there are tiles on the rooftops”.
It was the case, however, that Luther had been assured by
the Emperor of his safe conduct. Of course, Charles was perfectly capable of
changing his mind but Luther was prepared to trust his good word.
Conflict of Arguments
Luther was appalled by the corruption in Rome and certain of
his own principles. He refused to accept the absolute authority of the Church,
preferring to rely on “scripture and plain reason”.
Emperor Charles’s counter argument was that “a single monk,
deluded by his own judgment”, was in no position to conclude that “all
Christians up till now are wrong”.
There was no chance that Luther would win his case, which he
concluded by saying: “Here I stand. I cannot do otherwise”.
The net result was that Martin Luther was excommunicated by
the Church, having been condemned as a heretic. However, Charles was an
honourable man and he refused to allow Luther to be seized and punished.
After the Diet
Martin Luther would spend the remaining 25 years of his life
preaching for reform in Germany, while Charles V would oppose the trend – with
limited success - for the 37 years that remained to him.
© John Welford
