16th December 1773 was the day of the “Boston Tea
Party”, which is generally regarded as the opening move of the American
Revolution.
It cannot be denied that the British government mishandled
the colonial problems that it faced. In short, the colonies were costing more
to administer and protect than they were producing in benefit for the home
country. When the Seven Years War ended in 1763 the British were faced with
having to maintain a standing army in the American colonies that was being paid
for by taxing their own population to the hilt. The colonies had to be made to
pay their own way.
The methods that the British government used to achieve this
end may have seemed logical at the time but they did not go down well with the
colonists who were far more concerned about their own situation than the bigger
picture of the British Empire – naturally enough. The colonists saw no reason
why they should pay any sort of tax to the home country, but the British
parliament, equally logically, saw no reason why the colonists should expect a
free ride at Britain’s expense.
A whole series of financial impositions was made on the
colonies, of which the duty on tea was only one. A complicating factor was that
the company that controlled Britain’s trade in tea, the British East India
Company, had been given permission to send tea to the colonies tax free and
charge what they wanted for it rather than going through a middleman.
This move was resented by the colonists, who saw it as a
move to establish a trade monopoly, despite the fact that the tea that was
being delivered to Boston in December 1773 would have been offered for sale at
a lower price than previously, due to the relaxation of the full duties that
would otherwise be paid, although there was a still a residual duty. It was the
very fact that some duty was still payable that offended the Bostonians,
because the principle was thus established that the British government had the
right to levy charges on the colonists.
The whole issue of “no taxation without representation” was
something of a smokescreen, because it ignored the fact that what was at issue
here were duties and not taxes. It made no sense to demand seats in the
parliament of a country that levied import duties on the purchasers of its
goods, because this would apply to the citizens of any country doing the
importing, but this was not an argument that would have cut much ice with the
American colonists for whom the tea issue was the final straw.
As it was, an organised mob of about 60 Boston citizens, led
by Samuel Adams, dressed themselves as Mohawks – to add an element of theatre
to the proceedings – and boarded three ships in Boston Harbour to tip 342 tea
chests overboard.
The British response to the incident was “overboard” in
another sense, in that repressive measures were taken to force the rioters to
pay for the lost tea. It was this attempt to punish the colonists of Massachusetts
that really lit the fuse that would lead to revolution, rather than the Tea
Party itself.
© John Welford
No comments:
Post a Comment