On 27th February 1933 a young Dutch bricklayer
with a grudge against the government set fire to the Reichstag (the Parliament
building) in Berlin and inadvertently helped Adolf Hitler and the Nazis to take
complete control in Germany.
Marinus van der Lubbe had been a Communist at some stage in
his life but had no formal link with the German Communist Party at the time of
his action, although he was motivated by a general loathing for capitalism, the
workings of which he blamed for Germany’s woes including rampant inflation and
mass unemployment.
However, the knowledge that van der Lubbe had been a
Communist was enough to prompt the Nazis to launch a crackdown on the
opposition. Hitler had been Germany’s Chancellor for a month before the
Reichstag fire, and elections were due to be held that the Nazis hoped would
give them a clear majority, although this was by no means certain. The
destruction of the Reichstag was all they needed as an excuse to demonstrate
the dangers that Germany faced from Bolshevism unless the Nazis took complete
control.
Van der Lubbe never denied his part in the Reichstag fire,
but always claimed that he acted alone. The Nazis thought differently and
immediately passed laws that were aimed at all Communists and parties of the
Left. The right to peaceful assembly and free speech was withdrawn, press
censorship was introduced, and Nazis thugs targeted trade unionists and
intellectuals for beatings-up and torture.
Van der Lubbe was tried alongside the head of the Communist
Party and three other party members, all of whom were accused of having
conspired to torch the Reichstag. However, much to Hitler’s disgust, the court
could find no evidence to convict anyone except van der Lubbe, who was duly
convicted and later executed.
There has been considerable speculation over the origins of
the Reichstag fire, including the theory that van der Lubbe was duped into his
action by the Nazis themselves. In the end, the fire was just what Hitler
needed to unite public opinion in a fervour of anti-Communism, so it is not
inconceivable that this idea has some merit. If van der Lubbe did indeed act
alone, as still seems probable, his actions cannot have had anything like the
result he intended.
© John Welford
No comments:
Post a Comment